fbpx
Connect with us

Impact

Tech companies take more action to curb climate change

Published

 on

tech

Several of Europe’s top tech companies have teamed up with Leaders for Climate Change, a Berlin-based climate change non-profit bringing together various entrepreneurs from Germany’s startup ecosystem. 

The companies brought together under this initiative are the likes of idealo, Delivery Hero, BlaBla Car, Wefox, Doctolib, Ecosia, GetYourGuide, Flixbus, Glovo, Cabify, Personio and major VC funds such as e.ventures, Heartcore Capital, Northzone, Picus Capital, Project A, Holtzbrinck Ventures, Acton Capital, and Earlybird.

“Our goal is to turn the whole digital industry climate neutral, influence policy makers to set a global carbon price and act as an example for other industries,” Ferry Heilemann LFCA Co-Founder, serial entrepreneur and investor, said in a statement. 

These companies will aim to fight the climate crisis by pledging to turn business models to become carbon-neutral, building an active community that sets more sustainable industry standards, and influence policymakers.

Currently, LFCA boasts a workforce of around 100,000 employees, alongside a billion active users, giving the initiative immense promise and potential to be able to drive measurable climate action on an industry level. 

The non-profit based their growth on the direct communication to industry leaders, which has taken LFCA from being a grassroot organizations of entrepreneurs to the international stage. 

“We bet on personal commitments. The only way for any founder or CEO to join our initiative is to fulfill the Green Pledge. This means that they have to measure, reduce, and offset their personal carbon footprint, and commit to doing the same with their companies.” Boris Wasmuth, LFCA and GameDuell Co-Founder explained in the statement.  

The Green Pledge made by the LFCA community members, is an attempt to reduce a company’s carbon footprint by 20 percent, while initiating a collective investment of over €4m in climate protection projects, saving more than 250,000 tons of CO2.

LFCA provides a clear framework and digital tools for climate action. Membership is free of charge but, to maintain it, companies must repeat the process of measurement, reduction, and compensation from year to year. 

More than 60 percent of member companies have already implemented impactful reduction measures, such as switching to renewable energy and carbon-neutral cloud providers or maintaining stricter travel policies. 

The average member company aims to reduce its carbon footprint by 20 percent in the first year.

In parallel, LFCA welcomed more than 25 leading VC funds into their “Sustainability Clause” program this year. 

They’ve integrated the clause into both default term sheets and shareholder agreements. As a result, many of the newly financed companies will commit themselves to measuring their carbon emissions and working on reduction measures.

“As much as voluntary actions from individual companies are needed to contribute to the global reduction of greenhouse gases, LFCA’s belief is that only strong political actions can ensure that greenhouse gases are reduced and removed in all industries and throughout the entire value chains,” the non-profit said in the statement.  

LFCA have called for the immediate establishment of an effective greenhouse gas pricing applied on a regional, country and global level (ideally). The expansion towards 100 percent renewable energy and the global implementation of natural greenhouse gas sinks, must be politically enforced as quickly and effectively as possible.

“We see climate action as a journey that everyone needs to start today at the latest! Therefore, we focus also on companies that are not sustainable yet but are willing to take measurable steps to change this. If we don’t focus on these segments, the impact of climate action will simply stay too small,” Jeremias Heinrich, Co-Founder LFCA and Arvantis Group, highlighted.

Big companies, specifically big tech companies, have also hopped onboard the climate change bandwagon and have started taking decisions that would drastically lower their carbon footprint.

Microsoft: over the past decade, the company has increasingly focused on lowering their whopping carbon footprint. Earlier this year, the tech titan announced their goal to become carbon negative by 2030.

The goal is to remove its total carbon footprint – emitted either directly or via electrical consumption – since its founding in 1975 by 2050.

BMW: the German vehicle company announced a roadmap for the phase up to 2030 that includes the first-ever CO2 goals for full lifecycle in the next decade, as it plans to lower carbon emissions from its production lines by 80 percent per vehicle produced. 

Amazon: the e-commerce titan has set a goal to become a net zero carbon company across all its ecosystem by 2040. Back in 2019, the company witnessed a 22 percent increase in net sales while its total carbon footprint increased by 15 percent. While Amazon has been making investments in solar energy and electric vehicles, it has further committed $2 billion in June 2020, under its Climate Pledge Fund to invest in companies, which will facilitate the transition to a low-carbon economy.

In parallel, Apple will also work to achieve 75 percent lower emissions in the next decade, as it plans to develop carbon removal solutions that would cover the remaining 25 percent. 

Cisco: the tech company took matters a bit further by signing a long-term wind energy power purchase agreement (PPA), in its aim to receive 85 percent of its energy from renewable methods by 2022 with a 60 percent GHG reduction, according to the company energy roadmap.

IBM: the tech company has already managed to reduce 39.7 percent in operational CO2 emissions since 2005. IBM is also aiming to depend on clean energy for 55 percent of its energy demands by 2025.

Adobe: the organization set a goal to run its sites and deliver its products with 100 percent renewable energy by 2035, without the use of carbon offsets or unbundled renewable energy credits.

Apple: back in July, the company unveiled its plan of becoming a carbon neutral business across the board, promising that every Apple device developed and sold by 2030 will have a net zero climate impact. 

Facebook: Has already achieved a 59 percent reduction in operational GHG emissions in 2019 compared to 2017 levels and is on its way to achieve its target of 75 percent emissions reduction by the end of 2020.

Google: the tech titan became the first company of its size to match its entire annual electricity consumption with renewable energy. Today, Google is the largest corporate buyer of renewable energy in the world.

Disney: the company aims to reduce its net emissions by 50 percent by 2020 compared to a 2012 baseline. Disney recently bought a new solar facility, which will generate enough power to operate two theme parks in Orlando. It will equate to reducing annual GHG emissions by more than 52,000 metric tons.

Economies and the environment don’t have to be at odds with each other. 

Companies who are actively taking steps to lower their carbon emissions are cutting down on energy costs, boosting employee morale, building a cleaner and more sustainable brand, while scoring points with their clientele, all while protecting the resources and planet we need to operate and thrive.

Yehia is an investigative journalist and editor with extensive experience in the news industry as well as digital content creation across the board. He strives to bring the human element to his writing.

Impact

Microsoft’s Activision Deal Holds Climate Quarrels

Published

 on

In the past, Microsoft has built strong environmental, social, and governance policies around itself, and now with the latest Activision Blizzard acquisition news, the Big Tech giant could be facing years of work to bring the gaming titan in alignment with its sustainability policies.

The Big Tech giant is already setting in motion plans to compensate the entirety of its monumental greenhouse-gas emissions. Still, the software developer might encounter certain challenges in mirroring its ambitions with Activision.

Activision has never uncovered plans to follow the lead of some of the biggest tech companies riding the wave of minimizing their detrimental effect on the planet. The company has barely disclosed any environmental, social, and governance (ESG) information and places far less sustainable policies than some of the sector’s most significant tech names.

While the deal is far from being completed – given it still needs regulatory approval – Microsoft would have to invest hefty efforts into Activision to reciprocate its sustainability policies and be applicable.

As of January 19, sustainability-driven funds exceeded $53 billion of the tech giant’s shares, placing it at the top when it came to such funds, according to data service provider Morningstar Inc.

Let’s compare this data with Activision Blizzard’s $869 million in funds. We can see that Microsoft might have a long way to actually fulfill its vision in interlocking its capabilities with those of the gaming giant.

Many factors drove Microsoft’s move to acquire Activision, and sustainability is one of them. The gaming mogul’s ESG problems, allegations of sexual harassment, and work-environment waywardness detrimentally affected the company’s share prices, sending its shares to a 6 percent drop by the end of 2021.

In its investors’ call, Microsoft emphasized investing efforts into setting groundbreaking rules to reshape Activision’s workplace culture, placing it as a priority.

While both companies are working to fill in specific gaps and mismanagement issues in Activision, the fact remains that there’s quite an ordeal of matters to be dealt with concerning managing gaps between both companies.

In Microsoft’s case, the company openly conveys many topics in its reports, ranging from “corporate social responsibility, environment, and diversity and inclusion,” according to The Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

The Washington-based company covers the amount of energy it employs from both renewable and non-renewable sources based on the region and the type of sources. The tech giant announced that it bought and consumed more than 6.8 million megawatt-hours in 2020 in North America, compared to a number exceeding 186,000 MWh from non-renewable sources.

From another aspect, Activision released its first-ever ESG document last year but failed to divulge any environmental metrics to support the report’s data.

“At this time, we are unable to collect data related to the energy and water footprint associated with our offices,” the gaming firm stated.

The reports indicate that Activision is not weaponized with the tools needed to obtain primary environmental data on its conduct.

“It will take a significant effort to collect Activision’s environmental data required to get its reporting to the same level as Microsoft,” said Joe Holman, leading the ESG practice at WithumSmith+Brown PC.

It is worth mentioning that Holman also predicted that once the acquisition reaches its final stages, it would take almost two years for Microsoft to gather the needed ESG data for the video game developer.

Activision did not immediately respond to a comment to WSJ. Microsoft refrained from commenting on the matter.

Continue Reading

Impact

Nissan, Mitsubishi to unveil 2030 EV plan this week

Published

 on

Renault SA, Nissan Motor Co and Mitsubishi Motors Corp plan to triple their investment to jointly develop electric vehicles (EVs), two people with knowledge of the plan told Reuters.

As established automakers face pressure from new competitors and an expected shift in demand toward EVs, the French-Japanese alliance is seeking to deepen cooperation.

The three are expected to announce on Thursday a plan to invest more than 20 billion euros ($23 billion) over the next five years on EV development, the sources said. By 2030, the alliance is expected to come up with more than 30 new battery EVs underpinned by five common platforms, they said.

That is in addition to 10 billion euros the group has already spent on electrification, said the two people with knowledge of the plan.

A Nissan spokesperson declined to “comment on speculation”. Spokespeople for Renault and Mitsubishi did not respond to requests for comment.

The “Alliance to 2030” plan aims to show “intensified cooperation” among the automakers, highlighting a “shared vision on electrification and connected mobility,” one source said. The five common platforms are expected to cover 90% of EVs the companies are expected to develop and launch by 2030, the sources said.

The three-firm alliance has developed and partly deployed four common EV platforms.

One underpins EVs such as Nissan’s upcoming Ariya and Renault’s Megane EV, and another supports affordable no-frills cars by Nissan and its China market partner Dongfeng, as well as for Renault’s Dacia brand. The other two are platforms for micro minis, called “kei cars” in Japan, and light commercial vehicles.

By mid-decade, the alliance aims to deploy a fifth common platform for compact EVs designed by Renault, the sources said.

Nissan has already decided to use this platform, called CMFB-EV, and other standardised components to electrify the Nissan Micra compact car, while Renault is expected to come up with a similar EV car based on the same platform, the sources said. The Micra EV is projected to be released by the mid-2020s.

AFFORDABLE EVs

The automakers hope to make compact EVs as affordable as gasoline-fuelled vehicles of similar size, the sources said.

The automakers are expected to use common batteries and other key components. The alliance plans to jointly invest in capacity to produce in France, Britain, China and Japan a total of 220 gigawatt hours of battery capacity by 2030 under the plan, the sources said.

By standardising and sharing batteries, the alliance expects to halve battery manufacturing costs, they said.

The alliance is also expected to share solid-state lithium-ion battery technology, which Nissan has been developing, they said.

The plan had been for the leaders of Renault, Nissan and Mitsubishi to announce the 2030 plan last autumn at an event in Japan, but the announcement was postponed until this week because of a surge in COVID-19 in Japan, the sources said.

A disagreement between Nissan and Renault over the French firm’s proposals for a full-blown merger – tensions that burst into the open with the arrest of former alliance leader Carlos Ghosn in 2018 – corresponded with stalled efforts to collaborate on technology and vehicle development, people with knowledge of the matter have said.

The three automakers all have their own hybrid technologies with few shared key parts and systems. The limited cooperation in sourcing and development has raised concern within the group about the ability to achieve cost savings, one source said.

It was not immediately clear whether alliance leaders will discuss hybrids as part of their 2030 plan.

Nissan said in November it planned to spend some $18 billion over five years to accelerate vehicle electrification, launching 23 electrified vehicles – including gasoline-electric hybrids – by 2030, including 15 EVs. Half of Nissan’s vehicle mix will be electrified by 2030, including EVs and e-Power hybrids, the company said.

Renault has said its Renault brand will be 100% electric in Europe by 2030, but company officials told Reuters the target does not apply to markets outside Europe and the group’s other brands, such as Dacia.

Continue Reading

Impact

Sony seeks new partners for transformative EV project -executive

Published

 on

Sony Group will likely add new technology partners to its electric vehicle (EV) project to help it forge a mobility business to transform cars from transportation machines to entertainment spaces, a Sony executive told Reuters.

An ongoing shift to electric cars, which are easier to build than those with internal combustion engines, is allowing new entrants into vehicle manufacturing. At the same time, autonomous driving and 5G connectivity is expected remold the auto industry by turning cars into mobile platforms for information and entertainment services.

“We see the risk of ignoring EVs as greater than the challenge they pose,” Izumi Kawanishi, the senior general manager who will manage a new Sony Mobility business, said in an interview. The coming transformation of cars was in some ways similar to how information technology turned phones into smartphones, he added.

Announcing the creation of that new mobility unit at the CES technology tech fair in Las Vegas this month, Sony Chief Executive Kenichiro Yoshida suggested for the first time that the creator of PlayStation games consoles will try to turn an EV development project started two years ago into a money-making venture.

“We understand that speed is important in terms of making a decision,” said Kawanishi, who joined the Japanese consumer electronics company as a software engineer in 1986 and heads the AI Robotics unit making Sony’s Aibo robot pet.

Kawanishi declined to say whether a final decision on whether to go ahead would come this year.

PARTNERS

So far, Sony has built two EV “Vision” prototypes with a factory in Austria owned by Canadian auto parts maker Magna International, which also makes cars for firms including BMW, Mercedes Benz and Toyota Motor Corp .

Other members of its Europe-based project include German auto parts maker Bosch, French automotive technology company Valeo SE and Hungarian autonomous vehicle start-up AImotive.

To bring an EV to market, Sony would likely have to invest heavily in plant and equipment. Tesla Inc, which delivered its first electric vehicle in 2008, has spent billions of dollars to make its business viable.

Sony will also have to take on traditional carmakers too, such as Toyota, General Motors Co and Volkswagen AG, which are spending tens of billions of dollars to beat the EV newcomers.

Sony is one of a growing list of technology firms exploring automotive opportunities, including iPhone maker Apple Inc, South Korea’s LG Electronics Taiwan’s Foxconn, and China’s Alibaba Group

Sony will pick new partners for its EV project based on the technology they can bring to the project, without regard to their nationality, Kawanishi said, when asked if Sony would partner with Chinese companies.


TOKYO (Reuters)

Continue Reading

Trending